On the Nature of History: Difference between revisions

From gronkfinder
(Created page with "{{InSettingTextNote}} {{InSettingTextInfo|title=On the Nature of History|author=|extra=Collected from incomplete notes written around the year {{Year|6910}}}} {{Quote|}} Category:Written works Category:Written works/In-setting perspective")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{InSettingTextNote}}
{{InSettingTextNote}}
{{InSettingTextInfo|title=On the Nature of History|author=|extra=Collected from incomplete notes written around the year {{Year|6910}}}}
{{InSettingTextInfo|title=On the Nature of History|author=[[Sangar-Lucan]]|extra=Excerpt from notes written by a [[Pasuhalta & Kamman|Katerran]] philosopher and historian in the late ninety-ninth century}}


{{Quote|}}
{{Quote|Or take the [[Viridia|Dominion]]. In its own histories, we learn of a thousand year period of greatness, of peace and prosperity. Was there truly no conflict, no division, no internal strife? Did the reigns of monarchs end peacefully and without struggle? Or does such a past exist only to direct the present?
 
We know of wars throughout the so-called Reign of Light. The later great invasions are more famous, of course, but others took place throughout this time  - border conflicts, re-subjugations of petty lords in the [[Ten Thousand Islands|western islands]], and so on. That they are not spoken of is no accident. It is, rather, intentional, for to shape the past can shape the present. Are we not more inclined towards the image of Viridian greatness if it can be remembered as greater still?
}}


[[Category:Written works]]
[[Category:Written works]]
[[Category:Written works/In-setting perspective]]
[[Category:Written works/In-setting perspective]]

Latest revision as of 05:00, 12 November 2025

This is an in-setting written work. It is written from a particular perspective and may or may not be factually accurate.

On the Nature of History

By Sangar-Lucan

Excerpt from notes written by a Katerran philosopher and historian in the late ninety-ninth century

Or take the Dominion. In its own histories, we learn of a thousand year period of greatness, of peace and prosperity. Was there truly no conflict, no division, no internal strife? Did the reigns of monarchs end peacefully and without struggle? Or does such a past exist only to direct the present?

We know of wars throughout the so-called Reign of Light. The later great invasions are more famous, of course, but others took place throughout this time - border conflicts, re-subjugations of petty lords in the western islands, and so on. That they are not spoken of is no accident. It is, rather, intentional, for to shape the past can shape the present. Are we not more inclined towards the image of Viridian greatness if it can be remembered as greater still?